Asymmetry between limbs: Does it really matter?

An investigation of the effects of inter-limb asymmetries and their impact on physical and sport-specific performance.

Owen Walker

By Owen Walker
Last updated: April 30th, 2024
3 min read

Contents

  1. Background & Objective
  2. What They Did
  3. What They Found
  4. Practical Takeaways
  5. Reviewer’s Comments
  6. About the Reviewer
  7. Comments

Background & Objective

The purpose of this review was to examine the effects of inter-limb asymmetries (i.e. differences between limbs) and their impact on physical (e.g. running and jumping) and sport-specific performance (e.g. swimming, kicking, and cycling).

What They Did

In a classic systematic review fashion, the researchers conducted a preliminary search of Medline and SPORT Discus to locate published articles related to inter-limb asymmetries and physical performance. After the filtration process, 18 studies met the inclusion-exclusion criteria and were included in this review.

What They Found

The results from this review suggest that inter-limb asymmetries in strength may be detrimental to jumping, kicking and cycling performance. Given the lack of available evidence, it is unclear whether jumping-based asymmetries have any effect on change of direction speed. Again, when assessing other elements such as anthropometry (e.g. muscle size), sprint speed, and dynamic balance, the results from various studies are very mixed.

Further research, including randomised control trials – whereby training interventions which focus on increasing asymmetries or decreasing asymmetries and their effects on performance are administered – should be a focal point for improving our understanding of this topic.

Practical Takeaways

Current arbitrary guidelines for between-limb performances are often thought to ideally be less than 10 % of one another. For example, if an athlete jumps 40 cm in a single-leg countermovement jump, but only 32cm using their left leg, this would indicate an inter-limb asymmetry of 80 % (32 / 40 * 100 = 80). So, the question here would be: should we attempt to reduce this asymmetry?
Some studies have shown that kicking accuracy and resultant ball speed are negatively affected by larger asymmetries, suggesting that reducing the asymmetry ‘may’ improve kicking performance. However, in my opinion, attempting to measure a complex skill such as kicking a ball and relating it to limb strength is always going to be problematic. Athletes are often better at kicking with their dominant leg due to several neurophysiological adaptations/skills which are specific to that movement (e.g. intra-musculature coordination and the magnitude and direction of force production). So to me, a score on a balance, or strength test, will have little validity with kicking a ball.

With regards to return-to-play parameters (e.g. ACL rehabilitation), I believe the context is very different, and I would most certainly be looking for a base level of symmetry in things such as balance, strength and power. And although there is minimal research supporting it, I believe symmetry of less than 10 % is an acceptable range, in most cases.

Reviewer’s Comments

“Although the findings of this study were not particularly sexy, it does provide you with a clear understanding of what we currently know and don’t know, about inter-limb asymmetries. For example, it’s not uncommon for a rugby strength and conditioning coach to determine jump performances of both the right and left leg. If the coach observes a significant right vs. left leg difference (i.e. inter-limb asymmetry), do they concern themselves about reducing this asymmetry? And if so, what is an ‘acceptable’ level of asymmetry (e.g. <10 % or >< 20 %)?
Well, that was the exact aim of this review paper, and the results really are a back-and-forth debate with no clear answer, at least for now. In certain circumstances, for example, ACL rehabilitation, I personally see great merit in gaining as much symmetry as possible for some basic parameters (e.g. isokinetic strength, balance, and power). For example, if an athlete can’t perform simple tasks such as a Y-Balance test with an acceptable degree of symmetry, what sort of risk are they at if they’re required to perform a highly-coordinated task – combining both speed and force – such as jumping and landing on one leg?”

Want to learn more?

Watch this video
Read this article

The full study can be read here.

Unlock 1,000+ Sports Science Studies For Free

Access the latest research on Strength & Conditioning, Nutrition, Coaching, Recovery, Technology, Rehab, and Youth Development.

Get Instant Access
Owen Walker

Owen Walker

Owen is the Founder of Science for Sport and has a Master’s degree in Strength & Conditioning and a Bachelor’s degree in Sports Conditioning & Rehabilitation from Cardiff Metropolitan University. Before founding Science for Sport, he was the Head of Academy Sports Science at Cardiff City Football Club, and an interim Sports Scientist for the Welsh Football Association.

He’s published research on the ‘Practical Applications of Water Immersion Recovery Modalities for Team Sports’ in the Strength & Conditioning Journal by the NSCA (National Strength & Conditioning Association). He has also been featured in the Sports Business Journal and The Roar, Australia’s leading sports opinion website.

More content by Owen
Performance Digest

Unlock 1,000+ Sports Science Studies For Free

Get instant access to over 1,000 must-know sports science studies without paying a penny. You'll get the latest research on Strength & Conditioning, Nutrition, Coaching, Recovery, Technology, Rehab, and Youth Development.

Get Instant Access